Antiderivation

If the derivative is the rate of change of a function, then the antiderivative is the accumulated change over time. It’s like an onion.

  1. describes the rate of change of
  2. describes the rate of change of
  3. describes the area under Both and say something about , they’re just in different directions. So, turning a normal function into its antiderivative is going to be like reversing a derivation. Let’s look at a derivation together.

What is the relationship between and ? Like, if we wanted to manipulate to turn it back into , what do we do?

But that is incorrectβ€” we’re missing the at the end. When we find an antiderivative, we don’t know what that is supposed to be, but we know that a constant could have been lost when doing our work. For that reason, we have a handy placeholder for any constantβ€” . We can just add to make our antiderivative have a β€œplaceholder” for the constant. We will also rewrite our value so it looks better.

Note that because represents any constant, you can theoretically solve for it if you have enough informationβ€” for example, if you know what equals, you can solve for .

Integration Examples

U-Substitution

For this we will consider:

We want to be one of our terms with in it, and we know that becomes , which will cancel out with later, so we will choose it.

We can then rewrite our integral and integrate with respect to .

Then, we substitute back in to get our answer.

Partial Fractional Decomposition

Now that we have isolated the factors with simple algebraic manipulation, we can try to solve for A and B.

We can expand that into:

And turn that into:

Where we can set equal to the coefficient of x, or 1, and to 7, then solve through:

Now, we can write our partial fractional decomposition out with properly substituted values; recall the third line step of this whole process.

Since we’re finding the antiderivative, it’s time to integrate f(x).

Recall that the antiderivative of is ; this is our essential concept for both these integrations. We can even rewrite it to look more familiar, then antiderivate:

So our final antiderivative is:

(As a note, is still because it is the combined constant of integration; ).

More PFD

Let’s consider a few more problems.

This problem is pretty identifiable as needing PFD; we can start by factoring the denominator into two parts:

Then we can proceed with splitting it up into fractions, then creating our system of equations

Then, we can substitute it back into the fractional equation and integrate term by term.

Another example can be this:

Integration by Parts

Integration by parts is when you integrate. By parts. The equation is:

You essentially just need to know how to decide what u and v should be. We can look at it through this function:

We will choose based on what is easier to integrate, which is ; that will be our v. Our u will then be . We should find and at the start.

And we can substitute into the initial equation: